Search-term review / guides

What a search-terms review finds: a worked example

By Abhishek Pal, performance marketer (apships.com). Last updated 2026-11-01.

A Google Ads search terms CSV analysis should show which searches deserve attention, why they were flagged and which should stay open. This worked example uses a fictional lamp store and a made-up CSV from a test fixture. The reported $162 in flagged spend is a synthetic result, not a customer's saving.

Start with what the file covers

The sample covers June 1 to June 30, 2026, a 30-day period. It contains 47 audited terms and $669 in spend. That is the review's boundary. I would read every conclusion against that file, rather than assume it describes the whole business.

The free summary reports $162 in wasted spend across 5 suggested negatives. It also shows projected monthly savings of $162, labelled as an estimate. The sample covers 30 days, and those displayed amounts are the same. Neither is proof of what will happen after exclusions are added.

The decisions are 32 keep, 5 negative, 9 watchlist and 1 noise. The sample also records 1 term already excluded in the account. Do not treat that status as another new negative to add. The useful next step is to read the reasons behind the suggested changes.

Read the most expensive suggestions first

The free browser check shows the summary and the three most expensive suggested negatives. Here is how I would review those entries in this sample.

"solar light bulk supplier": $90.00

This term appears in Weak-Search. The rule is R1 cluster: b2b_wholesale. The engine's reason is "matched 'bulk'".

The flag points to wholesale intent. Before accepting it, ask whether the store sells bulk orders. A retail-only shop may reject this traffic; a shop serving business buyers may want it. The matching word explains the flag. It does not settle the business decision.

"cheap lamp wholesale market": $48.00

This term appears in Generic-Search under R1 cluster: b2b_wholesale. The engine's reason is "matched 'wholesale'".

Again, the question is whether the offer fits. The reason does not say that anyone looking for a cheap lamp is a poor customer. I would review the full query and the store's sales model before approving the suggested exclusion.

"lamp png transparent": $12.00

This term appears in Generic-Search under R5x CTR kill. The engine's reason is "CTR 0.20% is under 30% of branch median 5.00% at 2000 impressions".

CTR means the share of impressions that became clicks. The flag compares this term with the sample's branch benchmark. The wording also suggests someone seeking an image file, which is my reading of the query. The quoted reason is the engine's numerical check. These are different pieces of evidence, and neither should be silently substituted for the other.

Check the remaining negatives and the warning

Generic-Search also contains "how to make a lamp at home" at $6.00. Its rule is R1 cluster: diy_content, with the reason "matched 'how to'". "lamp repair shop jobs" costs $5.50 and is flagged under R1 cluster: services_rental, with the reason "matched 'repair'". Although the latter contains "jobs", that is not the trigger recorded here.

The account-health warning reads: "'weak' converts at 0.00% - statistical kills are HELD as watchlist here; this is an account-level problem, not a term problem".

That matters when reading Weak-Search. A weak overall result should prompt a wider diagnosis before individual terms are rejected on performance alone. The "solar light bulk supplier" suggestion has an intent-based reason, "matched 'bulk'". It was not presented as a statistical rejection. I would keep that distinction visible during review.

Read what was held back

The watchlist is useful because a report should explain uncertainty as well as rejection. These examples remain open for different reasons:

I would leave a note explaining what evidence would change each decision. A watchlist without a next check becomes a place to forget terms. It should preserve the reason for waiting.

Inspect the paste-ready file before using it

These are the four supplied preview lines. They are not the entire set of suggested negatives.

CampaignAd groupKeywordMatch type
Weak-SearchAllsolar light bulk supplierPhrase match
Generic-SearchAllcheap lamp wholesale marketPhrase match
Generic-SearchAlllamp png transparentPhrase match
Generic-SearchAllhow to make a lamp at homePhrase match

"All" is the supplied ad group value. Do not assume that label selects every ad group in your account. Check the destination and the import preview. If entering negatives in a text box, preserve the match type through the required symbols. See Google's instructions for adding negatives.

Review, paste, then return next month

Reject suggestions that conflict with the offer. Choose exact or phrase using the match-types guide. Paste only accepted entries into the intended negative-keyword destination, check the saved changes and record the date. Next month, use the export guide to repeat the review and revisit the watchlist.

Run the summary and top suggestions locally in your browser with the free browser check; nothing is uploaded. For the full review and paste-ready file, use the search-term review. Every suggestion still needs your decision.

Questions

Is this a real customer account?
No. The lamp store, CSV and results are synthetic. They come from a test fixture and show how to read a report. They are not evidence of a customer's savings.
Does the $162 estimate mean I will save $162?
No. It is the sample's projected monthly savings estimate, based on flagged spend. Future searches, spend and your accepted exclusions can differ. It is not a measured result after changes.
Why does the report keep a watchlist?
Some terms need more evidence or a business decision. The sample holds a brand query, a competitor query below its economic threshold and a relevant product query with no recorded conversions.
Does the report change Google Ads for me?
No. You review the suggestions and add the accepted negatives yourself. The tool does not access your Google Ads account. Check the match type and destination before saving.

Sources

Have an export ready? The search-term review finds the wasted spend in it for free. The full report is $39. Run it on your file.

Guides